Are You
Firing Blanks
Note : This article presumes
your primary business purpose is to make profit.
No, this article doesn't deal with male biological
issues, the 'blanks' referred to are simply unprofitable
business resources. And please remember that profit is not
always measured directly in dollars, time is also valuable.
A business resource can be defined as an
asset that aids one's business purpose, and there are costs
associated with any asset. Using accounting terminology,
the Return On any Investment (ROI) should always
be directly or indirectly, positive. If not, a solution
may involve sourcing a less expensive alternative, updating
your manufacturing techniques, revising your pricing structure,
or perhaps a resource deletion.
'Deletion' does sound serious, I agree. But
to persist with 'blanks' that directly oppose your primary
business goal of making profit is nonsense. 'Business stupidity'
may be a more appropriate term.
Two very important potential 'blank' resource
groups form the crux of any business; they are your salespeople
and your customers. Members of both groups are
hired, and when necessary they need to be
fired. The hiring/firing of employees isn't
a new concept to most of us, but perhaps the hiring/firing
of customers maybe something a little lateral for some readers.
In addition to the direct effect of poor
performance from these two groups, the link between them
is your primary marketing information source. Your customers
continually provide vital clues as to the 'match/mismatch'
between your Marketing Mix and their Purchasing Mix. Both
groups need to perform in a variety of ways.
There are many similarities between them:
- Very expensive to hire & train ... the good ones
are difficult to replace
- Can be very time-consuming ... those continual empty
promises
- Risky ... no guarantees of success
- Getting accurate information is like pulling teeth
Non-performing customers and salespeople
can be similarly treated according to three steps:
Hiring Salespeople :
Ignoring the flowery questions that many
(especially) small business owners/managers/sales managers
tend to ask applicants at interviews (yes, me too!!), you
need to establish four important things:
- Do they understand the job requirements? Leave
no 'grey areas'.
- Does your organisation enable salespeople
to carry out their job requirements effectively?
- Is the applicant an interesting person that
will fit into the team?
- Have they shown proof of previous results and
capability? Remember, many of them hold Doctorates
in 'Spin'.
Now get them to sign a lawyer-approved
performance-based employment contract, even if they
are only earning sales-based commission. Explain it well,
and get a signed understanding, and a signed acceptance
of all conditions. Detail specifically any clauses referring
to employment termination. Ensure clauses pertaining to
the use of any information are included.
All your salespeople, irrespective of their
remuneration setup, cost you. Even more so should they not
be performing. The question then beckons, "What are
they really doing out there"? If necessary, you
must be able to terminate their employment very quickly.
A salesperson's job security should always be his/her sales
performance.
In return for the contractual situation,
if they perform as required, PAY VERY WELL. Remember
(assuming you haven't got a badly designed compensation
package), if they are earning lots ... so are you.
Follow the above recipe and you will only
attract above average salespeople, you'll scare off the
non-performers. Let applicants back themselves; their
employment needs to be at their risk, not yours.
Firing Salespeople :
Any 'blanks' need to go ASAP. This is where
astute sales-management is vital, or it will cost your organisation
a lot more than you think. But what are those costs:
- Direct costs of employment
- Opportunity costs of sales not attempted/won
- Market share performance
- Image damage; what is being said/done with your customers
- Misleading information to you
- Information to competitors
Poorly performing salespeople know they aren't
achieving the expected results and are smart enough to plan
for the inevitable. Albeit somewhat creatively, it's likely
they will have a copy of your customer database already.
Clauses against its use by any party must be in the contract
signed at the time of employment.
a) Contracted Salespeople:
Talk to your identified 'blank'. The conversation
regarding their performance won't come as a surprise, but
your pleasantries might throw them a little. During this
conversation the situation needs to be qualified, and their
non-performance history fully explained. * The salesperson
needs to understand that you have decided to end the relationship
and why, and that it will be done as per the contract they
signed. Be clinical.
At this point you have a caged animal very
much on the defensive. They will promise to change, guarantee
improvements, and then there are always those many external
mitigating circumstances and excuses? The old cliché
that a leopard doesn't change its spots certainly applies,
and a probation period will simply waste time for both parties,
and only waste your money. They are probably well into their
new job-search process, and only want to rort out another
few weeks pay.
Have a pre-paid cab arranged to take them
home (assuming they use a company car), and their final
pay cheque ready. Monitor the removal of personal belongings
(desk/car) and escort them off the premises.
b) Non-Contracted Staff:
Help them to go ... yes! This applies to
any employee, not just sales staff. In most developed countries,
employee-protection legislation exists and smart employees
know how to use it. Avoid possible confrontation legalities
and unpleasantness by coming to a mutual agreement regarding
the situation (i.e. square peg in a round hole), and then
promoting their job-search efforts. **
Sure, it's a tough financial and personal
pill to swallow, but the alternative often becomes a waste
of time, effort and money. Allowing them to attend interviews
during work time and supporting their move is a simple form
of damage control. If by chance they haven't plundered your
files, they possibly won't, and if negative gossip hasn't
yet permeated the office, it too may not occur. They'll
leave a lot sooner (cheaper for you), with far less animosity
than would otherwise be the case.
Yes it's going to be expensive to replace
the person, but the situation is quite possibly partly your
fault! How well were they interviewed? What monitoring processes
have been in place throughout their employment? How well
was the job specified? How was performance measured? Were
all the necessary resources supplied? Were they a square
peg in a round hole from the beginning? ... You should have
seen the signs.
As an employer, you should learn from these
situations. Document all details and try to avoid the same
issues in future.
Hiring Customers :
They're hired just the same. The costs associated
with getting new business are normally measured in time
value. Add a few extra people into the equation for major
tender responses and the initial expense can be extremely
expensive. I only hope you do enough homework (risk minimising)
to warrant the gamble. It's also worth considering opportunity
costs of the work those extra people haven't done.
Consider an example: (normal day-to-day
business)
The cost of a salesperson on an hourly basis
(include overheads) is calculated as $30. Assuming a sales
hit-rate of 1:10, the average time spent losing a sale being
2 hours and the average time spent winning a sale being
7 hours, the direct cost to the company for each
order from that salesperson is $700 (18 x lost-sale hours,
plus 7 x won-sale hours = 25 hours x $30). Add in other
assistance and it's likely that for each successful sale
(tenders aside) the company has actually spent close to
$1000. Often the initial purchase-order profit doesn't cover
this cost.
Then there are the ongoing costs of those
customers, keeping an account operating, payment terms,
authorised discount levels, support labour/time, phone-calls/time
etc. Although these costs may seem minor, multiply $20/year
by a few hundred almost-dormant customers.
Sorry for being a little cynical, but some
customers will use you as an expert they can call upon for
advice and guidance. They don't intend to buy anything,
but as their supposed supplier they feel they have the right
to abuse the relationship in this way. Sadly, you feel obliged
to assist, in the romantic notion that they will automatically
purchase from you in the future.
Customers are fickle. They will also approach
your competition when a major purchase is planned. There
are no guarantees of your success, yet you have suffered
the expense of being their free consultant.
Firing Customers:
Have you ever wondered why many large organisations
stop dealing directly with their little customers? They
just aren't profitable ... so they're fired, for doing absolutely
nothing wrong. These non-profitable customers are very generously
passed onto their agents/dealers to handle ... unprofitably
... in the hope that they might buy sometime soon. And what's
more, the list is often very out-of-date. Well ... what
can one say, "Thanks for the opportunity expense".
Why do smaller businesses cling to
those almost-dormant 'blanks' like their business life depended
on them, perhaps it does. The mistake they make is setting
up accounts for them, offering them an automatic discount
level, and giving them 30 days to pay. Wait until the customer
earns those privileges. As a suggestion, establish the cost
of invoicing, producing statements etc, it may surprise.
We've all heard of the 80:20 rule, 80% of
your business from 20% of your customers. The other 80%
of your customers are potential 'blanks' that are probably
on the customer databases of most of your competitors, with
a similar status. Perhaps 10% of those potential 'blanks'
may make reasonable purchases in the medium future and if
possible you need to establish which organisations they
are, and maintain their status quo.
Fire the remaining 70% (approx) and make
them cash-sale C.O.D. customers, who will simply receive
cash receipts at the time of purchase. Until they earn the
right to improved conditions, give them nothing, but be
sure to explain your system to them. To become an account
customer with 30-day terms they need to spend over a predetermined
minimum each year. Discount levels kick in at predetermined
annual purchasing levels, etc.
You do however want to keep in contact with
your fired 'blanks'. A single-page quarterly email newsletter
is ideal to inform people of latest developments and special
deals. Ensure your emailing list is 'opt-in' only.
**********
Sterility aside (apologies), congratulations
if you are firing business 'blanks' within your organisation.
If you're not, count your losses, as they're mounting as
you read.
**********
* The 'Business Basics' Spreadsheet
Package (only $295 Aus.) available from Business
Rationale includes tools that will assist. Business
Basics
** Business Rationale is soon to
release a new E-Book detailing Interview Techniques (both
Interviewer & Interviewee) and the Job-Search
Process, including Résumé Templates and various
Analyses
About the Author
Steve Underhill (MD - Business Rationale)
is a business consultant dedicated to helping SME's (Small-Medium
Business Enterprises) understand more about business techniques.